这些为了孩子的父母们

2006年去加州 reisen，besuchen einen 朋友。她刚当了妈妈，在当地的月子中心坐完月子。听她讲起来，似乎 Umgebung 还不错：Es gab qualifiziert und lizenziert 的护士24小时看护，有专门的 Kinderkrippen，还有专人准备中国 Mütter 坐月子 benötigt 的那些 Nahrungsergänzungen。她说，Außer 像她这 Art 在美国工作 und leben 的中国妈妈，还有一些 speziell 从台湾飞过来的 Schwangere，为了给孩子拿一本美国 Pass。

过去几年，相关的新闻报道不少，从这些报道里面知道，这些原本由台湾人 führen 的月子中心，immer mehr von Festland-人 übernommen，而 Schwangere vom Festland，bereits 成为这些月子中心的主力。

因为月子中心里面的住客 immer mehr，大约在2007年的时候还发生了这 Art 一件事情，一家月子中心因为进进出出的 Schwangere 太多，而且 der größte Teil 是 Asiatinnen，以至于邻居以为这是 Menschenschmuggler 在 Handel mit Säuglingen 和人口，于是 riefen sie die Polizei。Schwer bewaffnet 的 Polizisten traten die 门 ein 而入，结果发现是一场 Oolong Tee。

不过，那次行动 führte zu 美国 Polizei 对月子中心的 Razzien，因为很多月子中心是无 Lizenz geführt。首先，美国 Verordnungen，Wohnung 不能作为 Geschäftsorte；其次，美国对于 Kinderkrippen 有 strikt 的 Flächenverordnungen，而很多非法 geführt 的月子中心，往往把 Garagen 或者 Küchen umgebaut 成为 Kinderkrippen。去年，美国南加州地方 Regierung 在 untersuchen illegale Gebäude 的时候，发现非法 geführt 的月子中心 wie zuvor 很多。

多 impliziert 有 Nachfrage，对于一些中国父母来说，只要安全，不 betrogen werden，为了孩子拿到美国 Staatsangehörigkeit，钱不是问题。和那些 speziell 到香港生孩子的父母 ist es genauso，有的为了 entkommen 中国的 1-Kind-Politik，有的是觉得，可以让孩子未来多一点 auswählen。

...

sina blog 2012-02-20

Luqiu Luwei

Übersetzung

These parents who live for their children

In 2006, I went to California to see a friend. She had just become a mother, and was reaching the end of her post-natal month of rest in a specialised centre. From what she said, it seemed the environment was not too bad: 24 hour care from certified nurses, a dedicated nursery, and someone to prepare the traditional food supplements that Chinese mothers take during the month after giving birth. Besides Chinese mothers who, like her, worked and lived in the US, there were also pregnant women from Taiwan who had flown over to give birth, so that their child could get an American passport.

Over the last few years, there have been many reports on this subject. These reports tell us that these centres – originally operated by Taiwanese people – have now been taken over by mainlanders; pregnant women from mainland China now constitute the bulk of patients for these centres.

Because of this increase in numbers, the following story happened, around 2007. After seeing that one of these centres had a high number of pregnant women coming in and out, almost all of them Asian women, some neighbours thought it was a people smuggling centre, trafficking in women and babies, and they called the police. Heavily armed police kicked their way in; and after searching the place, all they could find was a box of Oolong tea.

However, that incident led to a series of American police raids on post-natal centres, many of which operate without a license. First, according to American regulations, a home can not be used as a place of business. Second, America has strict regulations on what areas can be used as nurseries, but in many of these centres, garages or kitchens are used as nurseries. Last year, when local governments in Southern California inspected illegal constructions, they discovered many post-natal centres operating as illegal businesses.

The demand is increasing. For some Chinese parents, the minimum requirement is safety, and not being cheated, but if the centre will allow the child to get an American passport, money is not a problem. And it is the same for parents who go to Hong Kong to have a child, either to escape the one-child policy, or because they think that it will give the child more options in the future.

...

Julien Leyre website

Wechat 有“罪”吗？

风青杨: 著名 Firmenmarkengeschäft Strategie-专家。现任 "Gewinne 天下 (Huì yíng tiānxià)" Markenplanungs-机构CEO。《中国 Wirtschafts-报》《Wirtschaftsbeobachter-报》《Verkauf 与市场》《Internationale 公关》usw. 一线 Nachrichten 一线 Author。

最近有 Medien-新闻报道有人利用 Wechat betrügen 的事件。报道说有人利用 Wechat “schütteln” und “查看 umgeben 的人” 强大功能，成功的对 Wechat 上的“fremden 人” Betrug、Diebstahl 和 Mißbrauch。于是 die Polizei 像以前 genauso “再次”强调“不要相信 fremden 人”，甚至有 Webnutzer 开始 aufrufen，要 Tencent 公司 aufgeben Wechat 的功能。Ähnlich 的 Kontroverse，记得在QQ刚刚兴起时也曾有过，面对 Technologie 的 Fortschritt，我们该如何 wählen？

果真如此，如果因为有人, die betrogen wurden，就要 schließen Wechat。那么 nach 这个 Logik，gegen 手机 SMS-Betrug，是不是就要 schließen China Mobile 和 China Unicom？有人, die im Online-Shop betrogen wurden，是不是就要 schließen Taobao 和京东？Online-广告 Betrugsfall 一发，是不是就要 schließen 百度？照此 Art Logik，中国的 Internet 上市公司 grundsätzlich 可以 komplett schließen 了。中国人 werden 重新回到二十年前的 Technologie 水平，甚至饭也可以 daran denke 还要不要吃了，因为吃饭也 manchmal 会 ersticken 人。Aber selbst auf 那 Art，就不会有人, die betrogen werden 吗？

...

my1510.cn

Feng Qingyang

Übersetzung

Is WeChat “guilty”?

(Erster Absatz unübersetzt.)

Recently, the press reported that some users of WeChat are taking advantage of it to deceive others. The report says that people are using the “shake” and “look around” functions to commit crimes, such as fraud, theft and rape. Therefore, once again, the police emphasized that “you shouldn’t trust strangers”, as they always do. Some internet users even began to appeal to Tencent, asking them to abolish these function of WeChat. A similar controversy arose when QQ started becoming popular. So how can we make decisions when facing technology advances?

Are we saying that, because one person was cheated, we should all stop using WeChat? According to this kind of logic, should we stop using China Mobile and China Unicom as well? If someone is cheated through online shopping, should we close Taobao and Jiangdong? At the first internet advertising fraud, should we turn off Baidu? According to this logic, nearly all of the listed internet based companies in China need to be drawn off the market. Chinese people would return to the level of technology we had 20 years ago. And if we pushed this logic to the extreme, shouldn’t we say that people can die from all sorts of accidents, that they can even choke while eating. And even if we did all this, could we guarantee that no one will ever be fooled?

...

Julien Leyre website