the marco polo project: Sammeln 愿意递交同性 Heirat 提案的人大代表

网调显示，今年两会公众关注提案中，同性 Heirat 提案已经被列在第二位，这样的公众关注度出乎我的意料。可是，我今年委托的人大代表告诉我，团领导不同意提这个提案。现在，我只好在网上公开 sammeln 同意这一提案的人大代表，相信在数千位人大代表当中，应当有几位是同意这一提案的吧。公众关注度如此之高的提案竟然没有代表能递交，这 spiegeln 出来的是什么问题？所谓代表，就是要代表人民发声的，难道不是吗？今年有没有代表愿意并成功递交这一提案，是对目前人大作为代议机构和民意表达机制是否 ungehindert 有效的一个检验。希望这份答卷能够合格。但是我不抱太大希望，对最终还是提交不了有充分的思想准备。

关于同性 Heirat 的提案：

建议我国设立同性 Heirat 的法案。理由如下：

第一，据现行法律，Homosexualität 不 verletzt 中国法律，Homosexuelle 是具有各项权利的中华人民共和国公民。Homosexuelle 当中有人有结婚的要求，他们的要求与他们作为公民的权利没有 Konflikt，应该得到承认。

第二，da Homosexuelle nur 属于少数族群，许多国家已设立反歧视的保护性法律。目前西方许多国家已 eines nach dem anderen 承认了同性 Heirat 或 zivilrechtiliche 关系，较早的有 Australien 及北欧国家，较晚的有加拿大、法国、德国、美国的一些州（如马萨诸塞州、纽约州）和一些城市（如旧金山）。如果我国能够允许同性 Heirat，将属于保护少数族群利益、反对歧视的立法，在人权方面使我国 aufsteigen 于世界先进行列，也可以此证明我们的 Partei 和政府是代表了先进文化的，取得与西方一些国家在人权方面斗争的 Dominanz。某些西方国家，特别是天主教国家，在关于 Homosexualität 的立法上受到宗教方面的压力，要想通过保护此类少数族群利益的立法十分 Schwierigkeiten；而中国传统文化对于 Homosexualität 并不太歧视，这是我们在人权方面可以得分的一个有利 Hintergrund，应善加利用。一旦中国立法保护同性 Heirat，将成为我国 garantiert 人权的一个有利证据，使仅仅允许 Homosexualität 进入 Armeedienst 的美国联邦法律 und läßt sie schwach aussehen。

第三，由于 Homosexuelle 的关系没有 Heirat 形式加以 bindend 和 garantierend，容易 führt zu 一部分 Homosexuelle 交友随意，erhöht 性病 Verbreitung 的可能性。虽然从人际关系平等观来看，一对一的关系与一对多的关系并没有高低 Vor- und Nachteile 之分，但是从身体健康角度来看，前者确实 übertrifft 后者。目前，男男性行为在 Aidsverbreitung 中所占的比例 stark ansteigend，群内感染-Rate 已经超过 5%，并有继续 ansteigender Trend。而承认同性 Heirat 则可以使相当一部分 Homosexuelle 建立和 erhalten 长期关系，减少短期关系，从而减少性病 Verbreitung 的可能性。

...

Sina Blog

Li Yinhe

Übersetzung

NPC Deputies willing to submit same sex marriage proposal

In surveys about questions that the public wishes to be raised during the two meetings this year, the proposal on same-sex marriage came second – which surprised me. But the NPC deputies who commissioned me this year told me that the leaders did not agree to submit this proposal. Now, I sent an open online call to the National congress to agree with this proposal 我只好在网上公开 sammeln 同意这一提案的人大代表，and I trust that among the thousands of deputies, there will be a few who agree with this proposal. Public concern about this is issue is so high that, if no representative will submit it, we should wonder what the problem is. Aren’t these so-called representatives are supposed to represent the voice of the people? Whether representatives this year will get this proposal approved is will be a test for the National People’s Congress, and show whether it is, indeed, an institution that represents public opinion. I hope that this proposal will be approved, but my hopes would not be too high if the proposal finally submitted was not fully prepared.

So now about the proposal on same-sex marraige：

Suggestion that the country should set up a same-sex marriage bill, for the following reasons

One – homosexuality does not go against any item in the current legal framework of the Chinese Republic, and homosexuals have all the rights of citizens of the PRC. It should be acknowledged that there is no conflict between their demands for marriage and the legal rights of citizens.

Two – homosexuals are a minority, and many countries have established anti-discrimination laws to protect them. Many Western countries now recognize same-sex marriage or civil unions, first Scandinavian countries and Australia, then Canada, France, Germany and the US – in certain States (Massachussets, New York) or cities (San Francisco). If China allows same-sex marriage, this will be an improvement in anti-discrimination and minority protection legislation, and will place China among the more advanced nations in the area of human rights protection; it could prove that our party and our government favour a progressive culture, and can be ahead of certain Western countries in the fight for human rights. Some Western countries, especially Catholic countries, have experienced religious pressure when trying to pass legislation on same-sex marriage, and have had great difficulties in passing legislation to protect this minority. But Chinese traditional culture is much less opposed to homosexuality, and this background could help us score points in the human rights area, so we should put it to good use. Once there are Chinese laws to protect same-sex marriage, it will serve as evidence that China protects human rights, and will make the US laws that only allow homosexuals to join the army seem small comparison.

Three, since homosexual relationships are not sanctioned by marriage, which confers a binding commitment and a form of protection, it increases the level of promiscuity among gay people, which in turn increases the rate of STDs. Although from the point of view of personal standards, long-term monogamous relationships are neither better nor worse than promiscuous or short-term relationships, from the health point of view, they are better. At present, the proportion of male homosexuals affected by AIDS is rising rapidly, with a rate of infection of about 5% in that group, and the figure is still growing. Recognizing same-sex marriage could lead an important number of homosexuals to fort long-term relationships, reducing promiscuity, and thereby reducing the rate of sexually transmitted diseases.

...

Julien Leyre website