Wikijunior: 太阳系/木星 Sonnensystem/Jupiter

the marco polo project: 这些为了孩子的父母们

2006年去加州玩，besuchen einen 朋友。她刚当了妈妈，在当地的月子中心坐完月子。听她讲起来，似乎 Umgebung 还不错：有拿着 qualifiziert 执照的护士24小时看护，有专门的 aufziehen 婴房，还有专人准备中国 Mütter 坐月子 benötigt 的那些 Nahrungsergänzungen。她说，除了像她这 Art 在美国工作 und leben 的中国妈妈，还有一些 speziell 从台湾飞过来的 Schwangere，为了给孩子拿一本美国护 照。

过去几年，相关的新闻报道不少，从这些报道里面知道，这些原本由台湾人 führen 的月子中心，immer mehr 被 Festland-人 übernommen，而 Schwangere vom Festland，bereits 成为这些月子中心的主力。

因为月子中心里面的住客 immer mehr，大约在2007年的时候还发生了这 Art 一件事情，一家月子中心因为进进出出的 Schwangere 太多，而且 der größte Teil 是 Asiatinnen，以至于邻居以为这是 Menschenschmuggler 在 Handel mit 婴儿和人口，于是报警。Schwer bewaffnet 的 Polizisten traten die 门 ein 而入，结果发现是一场 Oolong Tee。

不过，那次行动 führte zu 美国警方对月子中心的 Razzien，因为很多月子中心是无照 geführt。首先，美国 Verordnungen，Wohnung 不能作为 Geschäftsorte；其次，美国对于 aufziehen 婴房有 strikt 的 Flächenverordnungen，而很多非法 geführt 的月子中心，往往把车库或者 Küchen umgebaut 成为 aufziehen 婴房。去年，美国南加州地方 Regierung 在 untersuchen illegale Gebäude 的时候，发现非法 geführt 的月子中心 wie zuvor 很多。

多 impliziert 有 Nachfrage，对于一些中国父母来说，只要安全，不被 betrogen，为了孩子拿到美国国籍，钱不是问题。和那些 speziell 到香港生孩子的父母 ist es genauso，有的为了 entkommen 中国的 1-Kind-Politik，有的是觉得，可以让孩子未来多一点 auswählen。

孩子是被动的，在哪里出生，在哪里上学，都是父母为自己做的 Pläne。只是，拿了一本美国护照或者香港 Sonderzone 护照，虽然多了一种 Auswahl，可以享受这两个地方的福利，比如 kostenlos 的公立 Erziehung，出行的方便，但是 berücksichtigt man 孩子的成长，事情不是那 Art 的简单。

有很多朋友，当自己要从美国回到中国工作的时候，他们总是要花不少时间 bedenken 这 Art 一个问题，自己的孩子 letztendlich 在哪里读书，bleiben 在美国还是跟着自己一起回国？回国 之后，letztendlich 是读本地学校，还是在 internationalen 学校读书？小学还好，到了中学，是把他们 lassen 在身边，还是让他们自己回到美国去读 Internat？

于是，有的 Familien，最终还是要天各一方，父亲 bleiben 在中国 weitermachen 发展自己的事业，钱 zu verdienen, um 养家，母亲带着孩子回到美国，Aber 孩子太小，放心不下，过早和父母分离，难免 beeinflussen 身心成长；有的让孩子 bleiben 在中国，或者读 internationale 学校，或者为了进 renommierte 小学中学，花钱花心思。

问题是，这些 Familien 是有能力的，而且对于他们来说，还可以退回美国。对于到美国或者香港生孩子的父母们来说，Wirtschaft 条件好的，自然没有太大的 Sorgen，但是如果家-Einkommen durchschnittlich，甚至只是 vergleichsweise gut 的话，wenn 孩子 mehr und mehr 大，Auswahl 的余地不是 allzu 多。

...

sina blog 2012-02-20

Luqiu Luwei

Übersetzung

These parents who live for their children

In 2006, I went to California to see a friend. She had just become a mother, and was reaching the end of her post-natal month of rest in a specialised centre. From what she said, it seemed the environment was not too bad: 24 hour care from certified nurses, a dedicated nursery, and someone to prepare the traditional food supplements that Chinese mothers take during the month after giving birth. Besides Chinese mothers who, like her, worked and lived in the US, there were also pregnant women from Taiwan who had flown over to give birth, so that their child could get an American passport.

Over the last few years, there have been many reports on this subject. These reports tell us that these centres – originally operated by Taiwanese people – have now been taken over by mainlanders; pregnant women from mainland China now constitute the bulk of patients for these centres.

Because of this increase in numbers, the following story happened, around 2007. After seeing that one of these centres had a high number of pregnant women coming in and out, almost all of them Asian women, some neighbours thought it was a people smuggling centre, trafficking in women and babies, and they called the police. Heavily armed police kicked their way in; and after searching the place, all they could find was a box of Oolong tea.

However, that incident led to a series of American police raids on post-natal centres, many of which operate without a license. First, according to American regulations, a home can not be used as a place of business. Second, America has strict regulations on what areas can be used as nurseries, but in many of these centres, garages or kitchens are used as nurseries. Last year, when local governments in Southern California inspected illegal constructions, they discovered many post-natal centres operating as illegal businesses.

The demand is increasing. For some Chinese parents, the minimum requirement is safety, and not being cheated, but if the centre will allow the child to get an American passport, money is not a problem. And it is the same for parents who go to Hong Kong to have a child, either to escape the one-child policy, or because they think that it will give the child more options in the future.

Children are passive. Where they are born, where they go to school – these are decisions that parents make for themselves. If you can get a US or a Hong Kong passport, at a certain level, it increases the number of your options, and allows you to enjoy the welfare system of these two places, like free public education and easy travel; but when it comes to raising up children, things are not so simple.

I have many friends who, when they think of moving back to China for work, spend a lot of time considering where their children should go to school: should they stay in the US as exchange students, or come back with them to China? And if they return with them, should they go to a local school, or an international school? For primary school, the decision is relatively easy, but as they reach middle school, they have to decide if the kids should stay with them, or return to the US and stay at a boarding school.

As a result, some families eventually decide to live seprately: the father stays in China to progress in his own career and provide for the family, while the mother goes back to the US with the children. But the children are too small, and can’t be reassured, when they are prematurely separated from their parents，and this will inevitably affect their physical and psychological growth. Other families decide to keep the children in China, but these spend considerable amounts of money either to pay for an international schools, or to help the kids get into prestigious primary and middle schools.

The problem is that these families have resources, and so for them, it’s possible to return to the US. For parents whose children were born in the US or Hong Kong, economic circumstances are good enough, and they don’t have to worry too much. But for the average family, or even families who are just well-off, as the child grows, there are not so many choices.

...

Julien Leyre website

Zurück zu Lektion 342 | Hoch zum Buch Vokabellektionen | Vor zu Lektion 344