Das Buch der Riten

Wikijunior: 太阳系/金星 Sonnensystem/Venus

the marco polo project: 就事论事

小时候很喜欢看 Lu Xun 的文章，后来有一 时间-abschnitt，看了一些关于他为人的文章，很是反感，dadurch 也不喜欢他的文字了。不过后来，人再长大一些，觉得自己很是好笑，对我而言他只是一个作家，用他的文字来 auszudrücken 他的 Standpunkt，我 brauchte 认同和不认同的，只不过是他的文字而 nicht mehr，为何要和他的为人 verbunden 在一起？再说了，他是一个怎 Art 的人，我同 Art 也是从别人的文字里面了解。

从小的 Erziehung，让我曾经有个 Gewohnheit，把 alles 的事情和一个人的道德好 oder schlecht verbunden 在一起，或者第一时间先去 herauszufinden 动机。后来一个比我年长一点的朋友讲起这 Art 一件事情：文化大革命的时候，实在找不出一个人的罪-Beweis，于是会 fragen 对方，为何要在这个时间出门？为何要在这个时间去买菜？一定 haben 不可告人的目的。这个时候，被 fragen 的人，真的无从 Erklärung，其实对方也 einfach 不想听 Erklärung，因为他们认为自己 bereits 找到了 Beweise。我听完 lachte auf，但是 sorgfältig 一想，这不也是我有意无意会 begangen 的错误。

我也经常看到这 Art 的 Frage：因为你存在道德问题，因为你的 Identitäts-问题，因为你的为人关系，folglich 你没有 Qualifikation abzugeben 看法，folglich 你说的话就是错的，在这种 Umständen 之下，是不可能进行讨论的，因为对方 bereits 从道德高度，zurückgewiesen 你，abgelehnt 你 zu akzeptieren。

...

Luqiu Luwei

Übersetzung

Judging things on their own merits

When I was little, I really liked Lu Xun’s writing, but later, at some stage, I read a few pieces about him as a person, and really disliked him, so after that, I no longer liked what he wrote. Then later still, I grew up again, and found myself quite ridiculous: for me, he was just a writer, and expressed his way of seeing the world with his writing, so what I needed to agree and disagree with was only what he wrote, why should it also be connected to him as a person? Beside, it’s from other people writing about him that I could understand what kind of a man he was.

In my childhood education, I developed a habit: connect everything to a person’s good or bad morals, or from the start, try to guess what their motivation is. Later, a friend slightly older than myself told me the following thing: during the Cultural Revolution, they couldn’t find any incriminating evidence against a certain person, so they started interrogating: Why did you go out at that particular time? Why did you go shopping at that particular time? You must have had some ulterior motive. The person interrogated really had no explanation for that, but the interrogator didn’t actually want any explanation at all, because they thought they already had all the evidence. I laughed when I heard this, but thinking about it retrospectively, I have to say this is a mistake I might have committed myself, intentionally or not.

I often come across this question: because of issues with your ethical position, because of issues with your identty, because of your relationships or character 因为你的为人关系, you’re not eligible to express your views, or what you’re saying is necessarily wrong. In such circumstances, discussion is impossible, because your counterpart has already taken the moral high ground, they have denied you access, they have refused to accept you.

...

Julien Leyre website